This report presents the results of our ergonomic analysis a telemarketing operation in the call center of a large mail order firm. Dr. Andres first observed the telemarketing floor during his visit on November 5, 1993. A subsequent site visit took place May 4, 1994; ergonomists Nancy Laurie, M.S. and David Wood, M.S.I.E. accompanied Dr. Andres and performed the analyses summarized in this report. It has been brought to our attention that since our last visit a possible change is being considered - the supervisors would be distributed about the floor so that the lead station and supervisors' offices would no longer be centralized. The implications of this change will be discussed in the Conclusions and Recommendations section.
The site visit on 5/4/94 yielded several types of data. Video records of task performance were acquired, both to document worker technique and worker interaction with their workstation as well as to provide examples that can be used during training (if training is pursued as an intervention). We measured the dimensions of the existing workstations across the entire floor area to determine what is available. We were also supplied with OSHA 200 logs so that we could understand the nature of the injuries and illnesses experienced by workers overall and in the telemarketing area.
Clerical worker exposure to ergonomic risk factors was estimated from both the on-site visit and a video tape analysis in our lab. Observational data and video data were summarized using ANSI's Z-365 checklist. The OSHA 200 Logs were reviewed; only ergonomic injuries were summarized (cumulative trauma disorders [CTDs]).
There were 3 lost time ergonomic injuries in 1993 in the clerical operation. We estimated the severity rate using the following formulas (Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS]):
Total hours per year = 415 (workers) X 30 (hours/week) X 50 (weeks/year) 622,500 hours/year
Severity rate for lost days = number of lost days/200,000 hours per year (57 (lost days) X 200,000)/622,500 = 18.31 lost days per 100 person years
Incidence rate for lost time injuries = number of lost time injuries/200,000 hours per year (3 X 200,000)/622,500 = 0.96 incidents per 100 person years
There were 9 other lifting injuries; each had no associated lost time. There were 268 lost days due to 3 slip/fall incidents. Seventeen other falls had no associated lost time. We gave a quick glance at the warehouse OSHA 200 Log ergonomic injuries. In absolute terms the number of lost days was some 10 to 12 times higher than those in telemarketing. However, without knowing the number of hours spent working last year in the warehouse, the incidence and severity rates could not be calculated.
After the site visit and viewing the video shot during our visit an ANSI Z-365 general ergonomic risk assessment checklist was filled out. Two aspects of the telemarketing operator's work (mechanical pressure at wrist and neck flexion) were above the trigger point (meaning that engineering or administrative controls should be implemented to reduce the physical stress on the workers). The workers rest their wrists on whatever surface is available as they type. This mechanical pressure is a risk factor for CTDs of the hand/wrist. The neck is also a potential site for CTDs. Workers must continuously look down at forms and papers on their desks and then look up at their computer monitor.
Table 1 contains a summary of the workstation heights. Only workstations with a computer and chair were included; the actual number of workstations used varies over time with the volume of sales.Table 1. Workstation height summary.
|Workstation height (inches)||Number|
The number of CTDs found on the OSHA 200 logs was small (3). Comparing the incidence and number of lost workdays with nationally published values for the finanace, real estate, and insurance sectors (which are the most clerical of the classifications published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in Accident Facts, 1993 Edition, referring to the 1991 statistics), the national average incidence of lost workday rate was 1.1 (versus 0.96 at here) while the average lost workdays were 24.1 (versus 18.3 at here). The clerical operation is better than the national average for the number of lost workday cases and for the number of lost workdays. That does not mean that improvements can not be made.
Suggested improvements will be proposed on both a short term and a long term basis. The short term suggestions are generally administrative controls, whereas the long term suggestions involve engineering controls as well.
Before concluding this report, the lifting and slip and fall incidents need to be addressed. Even though lifting is not a primary component of the jobs performed by those answering the phones (and perhaps because it occurs so infrequently), there were 9 incidents due to lifting in clerical employees. These employees need to be trained in proper lifting mechanics. The prevention of slips and falls for these workers is more a safety issue than an ergonomic issue, but slips and falls often lead to back injuries. Three lost day incidents were caused by falls experienced by clerical workers. Seventeen other falls or trips were experienced by office workers, but these did not lead to lost days. Although the injury log did not indicate where the falls took place, most of them may have taken place in another location besides the Telemarketing floor. Disparate surfaces (like tile and carpet or concrete and ice) can cause slips or trips when people move from one surface to the other. Obvious trip hazards in the telemarketing area should be removed if found.
The implementation of any of these short or long term interventions could best be handled by an active Ergonomics Committee as part of a structured Ergonomics Program. Such a program would include the training for the managers, supervisors, and employees that is referred to above, as well as generally raising the level of awareness of ergonomic issues across the entire telemarketing operation. With the approaching Ergonomics Standard being developed by OSHA, it would be better to start this process sooner instead of later.
In summary, even though the telemarketing operation currently has incidence and severity rates below the national average, several suggestions for improvements have been presented. Based on the OSHA logs we reviewed, however, it appears that the maximum opportunity for cost justifying ergonomic interventions is found in the Fulfillment Center distribution operation.
If you have a success story of your own that you would like us to post here you can reach us via
EMAIL at EEI@ergo.engin.com